John Roberts
Supreme Court Appointee . . . A Good Choice? I think so! |
The appointment of
Judge John Roberts has caused a stir between both sides of the political
aisle. The liberal wing of the government claims
that Roberts is too conservative and will overturn the Roe vs. Wade law
concerning abortion. The conservative wing claims
that Roberts will interpret the law and not make it. Read the letter to the editor below and consider having it sent to your newspaper. You can copy the whole letter and send it word for word or you can edit it to your liking. It is perfectly legal to do so as I am giving you permission to do so, therefore there is no plagiarism involved. Be sure to add your name, address and phone number to the bottom of the letter or the newspaper will not publish it. Dear Editor, Judge John Roberts, President Bush's pick to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court, brings with him one of the most impressive resumes any nominee to the high court has had in a generation.
Judge Roberts has succeeded in both the
public and private sectors — from his time as a law clerk to Chief Justice
William Rehnquist, to a brilliant career as a private-practice attorney,
to his current position as a judge on the D.C. Circuit appeals court. Most
impressively, as deputy U.S. solicitor general, he argued 39 cases before
the Supreme Court.
Despite this impeccable track record,
though, Roberts can expect to face stiff opposition from Senate liberals
like Ted Kennedy and Chuck Schumer and anti-Bush pressure groups like
MoveOn.org. They've already begun assailing his nomination, desperate to
keep off the bench anyone who believes a judge's job is to interpret law,
not make it.
Any purely partisan bid to
block Judge Roberts must not be allowed to succeed. He deserves a fair
hearing, and a fair vote in the Senate.
If you sent this letter to your local
newspaper, thank you! If not, we pray you will still
consider how you vote in the future and make a stand for Jesus!
Blessings, |